
And Give Us Our Daily Sex
1979

1974
Director
Jesús Franco
Runtime
98 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The story opens with Celestine eluding arrest with a friend as the police raid a brothel. While hiding out in the hayloft of the Count de la Braquette's estate, she meets the hayseed handyman Sébastien and the butler Malou, who reward her favors with the offer of employment. In a manner recalling Terence Stamp's effect on the household in TEOREMA, Celestine's open and relaxed attitude toward sexuality has a transformative effect on the isolated, moribund inhabitants of the mansion, imbuing them with gift of renewed life for the men and women alike, that remains even after a third act twist that forces her to betray them.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film explores a relaxed attitude toward sexuality that challenges heteronormative rigidity. However, it lacks explicit confirmation of queer identities or same-sex intimacy.
Gender Representation
Célestine serves as a transformative agent rather than a passive domestic worker. Her presence disrupts traditional hierarchies and revitalizes the isolated inhabitants of the estate.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting appears to reflect the homogeneous social structures of a 1970s European estate. There is no evidence of a multicultural ensemble or diverse casting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative critiques stagnant class structures and traditional institutions. It prioritizes secular sexual liberation over rigid religious or moral frameworks.
Disability Representation
There is no information available regarding the depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in this film.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Jesús Franco’s film functions as a moderate entry in terms of intersectional representation. It succeeds primarily through its subversion of gender hierarchies and its deconstruction of traditional class and moral structures. The film centers on Célestine, whose agency and sexual autonomy act as a catalyst for change within a moribund aristocratic household. This provides a progressive counter-narrative to typical period dramas of the era. However, the work lacks depth in other areas. The absence of racial diversity and explicit LGBTQ+ identities keeps the overall score from reaching a higher tier of inclusivity.

1979

1976

1966

1974

1987

1964

1987

1974

1980

1974

1972

1969
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.