A Lonely Cow Weeps at Dawn
2003
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.4 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Cowards Who Looked to the Sky
2012
Director
Yuki Tanada
Runtime
142 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Based on the award-winning novel of the same name, this portrait of a group of vulnerable, variously wounded people — a depressed housewife, her high-school-aged lover, and his best friend, who is struggling to provide for himself and his senile grandmother — whose intersecting lives yield both sorrow and a fragile, yet enduring, hope for a brighter future.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
6.1/10
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film does not explicitly confirm queer identities or non-heteronormative pairings. However, its focus on wounded, intersecting lives suggests a departure from traditional romantic archetypes.
Gender Representation
The narrative subverts domestic tropes by centering a depressed housewife. It explores the psychological erosion of feminine roles rather than portraying the home as a site of stability.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
As a Japanese production, the cast appears ethnically homogeneous. The story does not indicate a focus on multi-ethnic casting or the subversion of racial norms.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques traditional social stability by focusing on marginalized experiences. It portrays the family unit as a site of emotional labor and systemic pressure rather than solace.
Disability Representation
Mental health and cognitive decline are central to the plot. By centering depression and senility, the film treats these conditions as fundamental aspects of the human condition.
Strengths
- Strong focus on psychological vulnerability and mental health.
- Subverts traditional domestic and gender-based tropes.
- Provides a nuanced critique of traditional family structures.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities.
- Maintains ethnic homogeneity consistent with localized production.
- Does not explore multi-ethnic or diverse racial perspectives.
AI Analysis
The film functions as a character study of social and emotional marginalization. It prioritizes the lived experiences of individuals on the periphery of traditional societal structures, such as those facing economic instability and mental health struggles. While the production remains ethnically homogeneous, it excels in deconstructing idealized domestic narratives. The focus on psychological vulnerability and the complexities of caregiving provides a progressive, realistic lens on human connection. Ultimately, the work succeeds by integrating disability and mental health into the core narrative architecture rather than using them as peripheral plot devices.
Similar Movies
Vibrator
2003
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.8 out of 10
Border Line
2003
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.0 out of 10
Pieta in the Toilet
2015
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.0 out of 10
Days with You
2009
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.6 out of 10
Oasis
2002
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.7 out of 10
Blindly in Love
2013
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.9 out of 10
I Don't Want to Sleep Alone
2006
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.3 out of 10
The Garden of Heaven
2003
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.0 out of 10
I Just Wanna Hug You
2014
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.9 out of 10
Mee Pok Man
1996
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.8 out of 10
Westerland
2012
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.9 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.