Petulia
1968
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.2 out of 10
You are here:
The Arrangement
Representation Score
3.9/10
Limited
1969
RDirector
Elia Kazan
Runtime
125 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
Elia Kazan’s psychological study succeeds in deconstructing the emotional vacuum of the mid-century upper-middle class. It effectively critiques the superficiality of high-society institutions and disrupts traditional expectations of marital stability. However, the film is limited by its demographic homogeneity. While it offers a sophisticated look at systemic alienation, it does so through a very narrow lens that lacks modern breadth. The work functions as a critique of status-driven existence, yet remains tethered to the social constraints of its 1969 setting.
Category Breakdown
Does The Arrangement have LGBTQ+ representation?
The film strictly follows conventions that assume everyone is straight. There is no evidence of queer subtext or non-straight relationships among the main characters.
How does The Arrangement portray gender?
The narrative challenges the stable patriarch cliché by showing the male lead as emotionally inept. Female characters play a significant role in driving the story and create moral tension.
How racially and ethnically diverse is The Arrangement?
The cast is mostly white and affluent, reflecting the social constraints of 1969. The story stays within a homogeneous New York advertising elite.
How does The Arrangement represent religion and culture?
The film critiques Western institutional norms and the emptiness of capitalist lifestyles. It challenges the sanctity of the nuclear family by presenting it as a site of conflict.
Does The Arrangement include disability representation?
Mental health is addressed through the protagonist's nervous breakdown. However, this serves more as a narrative device than a nuanced exploration of mental health issues.
Present on Screen
- Challenges traditional masculine clichés by portraying the male lead as psychologically fractured.
- Gives female characters significant roles in driving the story and creating moral tension.
- Offers a nuanced critique of capitalist social structures and institutional emptiness.
Limited or Absent
- Lacks racial and ethnic diversity, focusing on a homogeneous social stratum.
- Features no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer subtext.
- Uses mental health primarily as a plot device rather than a deep exploration.
Official Synopsis
An adman attempts to rebuild his shattered life after suffering a nervous breakdown.
Where to Watch
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select or search, Escape to close.
Similar Movies
Lola
1961
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 3.2 out of 10
Two for the Seesaw
1962
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 3.1 out of 10
Je Tu Il Elle
1974
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 6.8 out of 10
The Brave Bulls
1951
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 1.2 out of 10
Separate Tables
1958
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.2 out of 10
Moments
1974
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.0 out of 10
Sweet Bird of Youth
1962
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 1.2 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.