
How to Lose Friends & Alienate People
2008

2006
PG-13Director
Todd Phillips
Runtime
100 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In the hope of winning the woman of his dreams, Amanda, lovelorn meter-reader Roger Wadell enrolls in a secret confidence-building class. The course's title takes on much more meaning when he discovers that his egomaniacal professor Dr. P also wants the same woman. They begin a fierce rivalry that quickly spirals out of control, their pranks and insults get uglier as they try to prove who is the ultimate guy's guy.
Overall Score
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any visible LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative narratives. The romantic objectives are strictly heteronormative, focusing on the pursuit of a female love interest.
Gender Representation
The narrative reinforces traditional gendered power dynamics through a 'battle of the sexes' framework. The female lead serves primarily as an object of pursuit, and the film fails the Bechdel test.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast is predominantly white and Anglo-Saxon, reflecting a homogeneous social environment. The film focuses on a narrow, culturally specific depiction of urban social maneuvering.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story explores situational ethics and social engineering as comedic tools. It prioritizes individualistic social success and traditional romantic pursuit over broader institutional critiques.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible representation of physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities within the primary cast or character arcs.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
School for Scoundrels is a character-driven comedy that prioritizes a competitive masculine framework. The plot centers on a rivalry between two men attempting to gain social dominance through deception and tactical manipulation. The film operates within a traditionalist structure, reinforcing conventional social hierarchies rather than disrupting them. It focuses heavily on heteronormative romantic goals and a narrow, homogeneous social environment. Ultimately, the narrative lacks engagement with intersectional identities, opting instead for a study of masculine ego and individualistic social climbing.

2008

1999

2000

2011

2007

2007

1994

2008

2012

2001

2013

1999
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.