You are here:

An Enemy of the People

An Enemy of the People

Representation Score

2.5/10

Limited

2005

Director

Erik Skjoldbjærg

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

An Enemy of the People is a specialized work that prioritizes intellectual and systemic critique over demographic variety. While it lacks representation for LGBTQ+ individuals, diverse ethnicities, or people with disabilities, it excels in cultural and institutional commentary. The film's impact stems from its deconstruction of the 'greater good' fallacy, examining how local capital and industrial stability can incentivize the suppression of scientific truth. Ultimately, the film's low scores in traditional identity metrics are offset by its high-level critique of how established economic orders can become oppressive to individual integrity.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does An Enemy of the People have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The story centers around the protagonist's professional and social isolation within a traditional community.

How does An Enemy of the People portray gender?

Fair

The narrative is driven by a male protagonist's moral struggle. Female characters exist but primarily support the central male storyline without challenging existing gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is An Enemy of the People?

Limited

The cast is predominantly white and Nordic, reflecting the specific Norwegian setting. The film maintains a homogeneous social landscape without diverse ethnic representation.

How does An Enemy of the People represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film provides a strong critique of Western institutional structures and capitalism. It effectively illustrates how economic interests can lead to the systemic suppression of truth.

Does An Enemy of the People include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities serving as central plot devices or possessing specific ability to act in the narrative.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a sophisticated critique of institutional corruption and the fragility of social cohesion.
  • Offers a potent anti-capitalist narrative regarding the pursuit of economic prosperity over public health.
  • Effectively frames community consensus as a potential tool for institutionalized deception.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight narratives.
  • Features a predominantly white and Nordic cast, lacking ethnic diversity.
  • Female characters occupy supporting roles rather than disrupting traditional patriarchal hierarchies.

Official Synopsis

In a modern version of Ibsen's stage play, we meet TV-celebrity Tomas Stockman returning to his native village to produce the world's purest bottled water. The plant will bring new life and hope to the village, but unexpected trouble occurs.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.