
Lakota Nation vs. United States
2022

Representation Score
Good
1998
Director
Joshua Oppenheimer
Runtime
48 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
Joshua Oppenheimer’s documentary excels as a critique of imperialist mechanics. By deconstructing the 'great man' theory of history, the film avoids celebratory Western narratives and focuses on the violent realities of state-sanctioned expansion. The film's strength lies in its racial and cultural engagement. It effectively highlights the historical reality of underrepresented populations by framing the Louisiana Purchase through a lens of displacement and genocide. However, the film lacks traditional character-driven representation. The focus on abstract historical critique and geopolitical ability to act leaves gaps in the portrayal of individual identities, particularly regarding LGBTQ+ and disability representation.
Category Breakdown
While the film doesn't feature explicit LGBTQ+ characters, its non-linear structure challenges traditional storytelling methods that assume everyone is straight or cisgender.
The movie focuses on the mechanics of statecraft and imperialism. It presents a fragmented view of power, undermining traditional masculine leadership.
The film offers a powerful critique of the Native American genocide through a decolonial lens, emphasizing the systemic violence of territorial expansion.
It critiques Western institutional expansion by highlighting the human costs of capitalism and state-building, challenging traditional historical narratives.
There is no discernible evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within this experimental documentary.
Present on Screen
Limited or Absent
Official Synopsis
A kaleidoscopic history of the American heartland, nuclear weapons and the Native American genocide.

2022

2012

2010

2014

2020

2007

1993

1989
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.