You are here:
We Still Live Here: Âs Nutayuneân

We Still Live Here: Âs Nutayuneân

2011

PG

Director

Anne Makepeace

Runtime

56 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A documentary about the efforts taken to revitalize the Wampanoag language, which almost died out.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.8/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film maintains a neutral stance regarding LGBTQ+ identities. It does not explicitly center queer narratives or non-cisnormative perspectives within its focus on language revitalization.

Gender Representation

Fair

The documentary emphasizes collective agency over patriarchal leadership. It presents a social fabric where identity is tied to heritage rather than rigid, Western-defined gendered power dynamics.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

This film provides exceptional representation by centering Wampanoag individuals as protagonists. It disrupts colonial naming conventions and grants high agency to the indigenous community.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The narrative prioritizes indigenous spirituality and ancestral memory over Western or Christian frameworks. It frames the community's relationship with Western institutions as one of resistance.

Disability Representation

Fair

There is no significant focus on physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The film remains neutral, neither centering disability nor using it as a narrative device.

Strengths

  • Exceptional centering of indigenous agency and sovereignty.
  • Effective disruption of colonial naming and historical conventions.
  • Strong emphasis on indigenous spirituality and ancestral connection.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of explicit representation for LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Absence of focus on physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

The documentary excels as a tool of decolonization, successfully shifting the narrative focus from Western-centric history to indigenous sovereignty. By centering the Wampanoag people, it provides a powerful counter-narrative to traditional colonial depictions. However, the film's impact is limited by its narrow thematic scope. While it masterfully addresses racial and cultural reclamation, it lacks specific engagement with LGBTQ+ or disability-focused narratives, resulting in a neutral score for those categories. Ultimately, the work is a profound study of linguistic resilience. It succeeds in disrupting historical hierarchies, even if it does not explore a broad spectrum of diverse social identities.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.