You are here:
The Secret World of Arrietty

The Secret World of Arrietty

2010

G

Director

Hiromasa Yonebayashi

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

14-year-old Arrietty and the rest of the Clock family live in peaceful anonymity as they make their own home from items "borrowed" from the house's human inhabitants. However, life changes for the Clocks when a human boy discovers Arrietty.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.4/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film does not feature LGBTQ+ characters or explore non-heteronormative identities. The central relationship focuses on curiosity between Arrietty and Sho without explicit orientation markers.

Gender Representation

Good

Arrietty serves as a highly capable female protagonist driven by agency and resilience. She avoids the damsel in distress trope, acting as the primary driver of her own survival.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The setting is a culturally specific, relatively homogeneous Japanese domestic environment. It lacks racial intersectionality but uses the Borrower subculture as a metaphor for marginalized groups.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative critiques consumerism by showing Borrowers repurposing discarded human objects. This highlights a sustainable relationship with the environment compared to the wasteful dominant human society.

Disability Representation

Fair

Sho is depicted with physical fragility and a preoccupation with mortality. The film handles his condition with nuance, focusing on his emotional state rather than using him for pity.

Strengths

  • Strong female agency through Arrietty's resourcefulness and independence.
  • Nuanced depiction of physical fragility and mortality in the character of Sho.
  • Sophisticated critique of consumerist culture and environmental sustainability.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of explicit LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities.
  • Limited racial and ethnic diversity within the established setting.
  • Absence of active pursuit regarding racial intersectionality.

AI Analysis

The film excels by subverting traditional gender roles, placing a resourceful female lead at the center of the narrative. It also offers a sophisticated critique of consumerist structures through the lens of the Borrower subculture. However, the film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ representation and multi-ethnic diversity, remaining within a culturally specific and homogeneous setting. While the Borrowers act as a metaphor for marginalized groups, the cast itself lacks racial variety. Ultimately, the work succeeds in challenging human-centric worldviews by validating the survival strategies of a hidden, non-dominant group, granting them complex agency and moral depth.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.