New Showbiz

You are here:
Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

2016

PG-13

Director

David Yates

Runtime

133 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In 1926, Newt Scamander arrives at the Magical Congress of the United States of America with a magically expanded briefcase, which houses a number of dangerous creatures and their habitats. When the creatures escape from the briefcase, it sends the American wizarding authorities after Newt, and threatens to strain even further the state of magical and non-magical relations.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.6/10

Good

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

Queenie Goldstein displays emotional fluidity and sensitivity that challenges 1920s social structures. While the romantic arc feels traditional, the character's depth allows for significant subtextual reading regarding non-heteronormative identities.

Gender Representation

Good

Tina Goldstein subverts 1920s tropes as a highly competent, career-driven Auror. Her agency drives the investigative plot, establishing a partnership with Newt based on professional respect rather than submissive femininity.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The film moves away from a homogeneous depiction by including various ethnic backgrounds within the magical community. This diverse ensemble helps create a more globalized fantasy landscape.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative critiques rigid institutions like MACUSA through the lens of systemic friction. It also explores socioeconomic divides between the magical elite and the No-Maj working class.

Disability Representation

Good

The Obscurus serves as a sophisticated metaphor for neurodivergence and the psychological impact of repression. This element is treated with narrative weight rather than as a mere plot device.

Strengths

  • Strong female agency through Tina Goldstein's role as a competent Auror.
  • Effective use of the Obscurus as a metaphor for psychological trauma and repression.
  • A diverse ensemble that avoids a purely Anglo-centric depiction of the 1920s.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of explicit on-screen confirmation for non-heteronormative identities.
  • Reliance on subtext and metaphor rather than overt representation for certain social themes.

AI Analysis

The film succeeds in disrupting historical norms by centering characters who navigate the tension between personal identity and institutional authority. It avoids many period-piece clichés by providing women with significant agency and professional competence. However, the representation remains somewhat indirect. Much of the social commentary is delivered through metaphor, such as the Obscurial phenomenon, rather than through explicit character identities. This creates a layered but occasionally subtle approach to diversity. Ultimately, the film builds a progressive framework within a fantasy setting, using its magical world to explore themes of systemic suppression and individual liberation.

How are these scores produced? →

Featured in

Similar Movies

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.