You are here:

22 July

22 July

Representation Score

6.5/10

Good

2018

R

Director

Paul Greengrass

Runtime

143 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Paul Greengrass’s film prioritizes historical realism and the critique of state institutions over identity-focused narratives. It serves as a critique of systemic failures, looking at how Western security systems failed to prevent radicalized violence. While the film lacks demographic diversity, this is due to its adherence to the specific Norwegian context of the Utøya massacre. The narrative focuses on the human cost and institutional inadequacies rather than promoting diverse representation. Ultimately, the work provides a nuanced examination of the breakdown of social contracts and the fragility of state power, even if it does not score highly in traditional diversity metrics.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does 22 July have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film addresses a tragedy within a political space known for inclusivity. However, it does not show explicit depictions of LGBTQ+ identity or non-straight relationships, focusing instead on collective loss.

How does 22 July portray gender?

Fair

Female investigators and legal professionals are shown as highly competent. The story avoids traditional masculine dominance, instead highlighting the vulnerability of victims and the shortcomings of authority figures.

How racially and ethnically diverse is 22 July?

Limited

The cast is mainly uniform, reflecting the specific historical and geographical context of Norway in 2011. The film does not seek to blend different racial backgrounds.

How does 22 July represent religion and culture?

Good

The story critiques the failure of Western institutions to address radicalized threats. It examines the tension between multiculturalism and extremist ideologies that reject modern social contracts.

Does 22 July include disability representation?

Fair

The film explores mental health issues through the lens of survivor trauma. These psychological struggles are shown as results of systemic failures rather than central character traits.

Present on Screen

  • Offers a sophisticated critique of the reliability of Western state institutions.
  • Highlights competent female professionals in legal and investigative roles.
  • Examines the deep psychological impact of trauma on survivors.

Limited or Absent

  • Needs more central roles for LGBTQ+ characters or explicit queer narratives.
  • The cast remains largely uniform due to the specific historical setting.
  • Disabilities are treated as symptoms of trauma rather than inherent identities.

Official Synopsis

On 22 July 2011, neo-Nazi terrorist Anders Behring Breivik murdered 77 young people attending a Labour Party Youth Camp on Utøya Island outside of Oslo. This three-part story focuses on the survivors, the political leadership of Norway, and the lawyers involved.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.