You are here:

One October

One October

Representation Score

7.2/10

Good

2017

Director

Rachel Shuman

Runtime

68 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

One October serves as a time-capsule documentary, using street interviews to capture the zeitgeist of New York City in 2008. Its diversity is largely a byproduct of its urban setting rather than a scripted ideological framework. The film functions as a documentary of record, providing a neutral, observational lens. It captures a multifaceted view of the city's inhabitants through spontaneous, unscripted interactions. While the work is inclusive by circumstance, it lacks overt systemic subversion or intentional LGBTQ+-centric storytelling. The diversity score reflects a work that is inclusive due to its geographical context.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does One October have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film captures a snapshot of urban life in a global LGBTQ+ hub. While it lacks a centralized LGBTQ+ narrative, the organic interviews allow for the natural presence of non-straight identities.

How does One October portray gender?

Fair

The documentary provides a balanced spectrum of gendered perspectives through its non-hierarchical structure. It presents a democratic distribution of voices without reinforcing traditional patriarchal structures.

How racially and ethnically diverse is One October?

Good

The film benefits from its New York City setting, capturing a high degree of racial and ethnic plurality. The interviewees reflect a diverse urban demographic rather than a homogeneous population.

How does One October represent religion and culture?

Fair

The work leans toward a secular, observational mode that avoids promoting singular religious or nationalist moralities. It prioritizes individual lived experiences over institutional narratives.

Does One October include disability representation?

Fair

There is no clear evidence of the intentional inclusion of neurodivergent individuals or those with physical disabilities. Such individuals do not appear to serve as central agents of the narrative.

Present on Screen

  • The New York City setting inherently provides a high degree of racial and ethnic plurality.
  • The non-hierarchical interview format ensures a democratic and balanced distribution of gendered voices.
  • The observational mode avoids the promotion of singular religious or nationalist moralities.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks intentional storytelling focused on LGBTQ+ narratives or critiques of heteronormativity.
  • There is no evidence of neurodivergent individuals or those with physical disabilities serving as central agents.
  • The documentary lacks explicit anti-capitalist or anti-Western critiques to deepen its cultural representation.

Official Synopsis

Reporter Clay Pigeon interviews New Yorkers in October, 2008.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.