Double Wedding
1937
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.5 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Double or Nothing
1937
NRDirector
Theodore Reed
Runtime
91 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A philanthropist's will dictates that four people receive $5,000 apiece, with the stipulation that the first one who can double the amount -- without dishonesty-- will win a cool million. Hindering the four are the avaricious relatives of the late millionaire.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
2.1/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any evidence of non-heteronormative identities. Its era and genre suggest a reliance on traditional romantic tropes common to the 1930s.
Gender Representation
The plot centers on a philanthropist's will and greedy relatives. This setup often uses women as romantic interests or comedic foils rather than agents of change.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative likely reflects the homogeneous casting standards of the 1937 Hollywood studio system. There is no evidence of a non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story follows Western moral frameworks regarding wealth and integrity. It focuses on capitalist structures like philanthropy and inheritance rather than critiquing them.
Disability Representation
No characters with physical or invisible disabilities are identified. There is no indication of neurodivergence or disability being integrated into the plot.
Strengths
- The film presents a clear, classic morality play regarding wealth and integrity.
Areas for Improvement
- The narrative lacks intersectional complexity and fails to disrupt traditional social norms.
- The film relies on the homogeneous casting standards typical of 1930s Hollywood.
- There is no evidence of representation for LGBTQ+ identities or characters with disabilities.
AI Analysis
Double or Nothing functions as a traditional 1930s morality play centered on a wealth-distribution contest. The narrative structure prioritizes a classic struggle between honesty and greed, reinforcing standard social hierarchies of the era. The film lacks intersectional complexity, adhering to the conventional storytelling patterns of the studio system. It focuses on a millionaire's legacy, which aligns with established Western capitalist values rather than challenging them. Without specific evidence of diverse casting or subverted social norms, the film remains a product of its time, emphasizing traditional tropes over social disruption.
Similar Movies
Fitzwilly
1967
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.6 out of 10
Ein schrecklich reiches Paar
2017
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
That Way with Women
1947
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
It Grows on Trees
1952
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.1 out of 10
A Millionaire for Christy
1951
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
Lady Behave!
1937
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
The Mating Game
1959
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.1 out of 10
The Smiling Lieutenant
1931
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
We're Not Married!
1952
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Four's a Crowd
1938
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
Mr. Boggs Steps Out
1938
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.