Angel Guts: Red Classroom
1979
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
My Sex Report: Intensities
1976
Director
Chūsei Sone
Runtime
70 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A man accustomed to calling the shots in his girlfriend’s work life becomes intrigued by a nurse and begins drawing her into a sexual world she never imagined.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
5.2/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The narrative centers on heteronormative dynamics between a man and a woman. There is no visible evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
The film subverts traditional roles by focusing on a woman's psychological and sensory evolution. Her journey from a structured work life toward sexual self-discovery suggests significant personal agency.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
As a 1976 Japanese production, the cast is culturally homogeneous. It functions as a localized study rather than a representation of a globalized or multi-ethnic demographic.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story prioritizes secularism and personal liberation over religious constraints. It critiques rigid social structures by exploring individual desire and the deconstruction of social propriety.
Disability Representation
There is no documented evidence of characters portraying physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film's narrative.
Strengths
- Subverts traditional gender roles by emphasizing female agency and psychological evolution.
- Prioritizes personal liberation and secular desire over rigid social or religious constraints.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks intersectional breadth, specifically regarding LGBTQ+ identities and non-cisnormative representation.
- Maintains a culturally homogeneous cast with little racial or ethnic diversity.
AI Analysis
Chūsei Sone’s film offers a mid-range exploration of progressive values for its era. It succeeds by prioritizing individual agency and secular exploration over the rigid moral hierarchies typical of the period. The film's strength lies in its subversion of gendered social roles. By centering a woman's sensory evolution, it moves beyond the trope of women as passive subjects. However, the work lacks intersectional breadth. The narrative remains confined to a culturally homogeneous cast and lacks any visible LGBTQ+ representation.
Similar Movies
Passions of a Private Secretary
2008
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.9 out of 10
Tandem
1994
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.0 out of 10
Diary of a Mad Old Man
1987
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.3 out of 10
Third Base
1978
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.0 out of 10
Angel Guts: Red Porno
1981
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.8 out of 10
Top Stripper
1982
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.7 out of 10
Scorpio Nights
1985
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.5 out of 10
Kaikan onanie: Niizuma-hen
1993
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.7 out of 10
O Olho Mágico do Amor
1981
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.8 out of 10
Ecstasy of the Black Rose
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.1 out of 10
Phone Sex
1999
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.0 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.