Angel Guts: Red Classroom
1979
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 6.1 out of 10
You are here:
My Sex Report: Intensities
Representation Score
5.0/10
Fair
1976
Director
Chūsei Sone
Runtime
70 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
Chūsei Sone’s film offers a moderate exploration of progressive values for its time. It excels by prioritizing individual ability to act and secular exploration over rigid moral hierarchies typical of the period. The film's strength lies in its subversion of traditional gender roles. By centering a woman's sensory evolution, it moves beyond the cliché of women as passive subjects. However, the work lacks multi-layered breadth. The narrative remains confined to a culturally homogeneous cast and lacks any visible LGBTQ+ representation.
Category Breakdown
Does My Sex Report: Intensities have LGBTQ+ representation?
The film focuses on heterosexual relationships and does not include any visible LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisgender identities.
How does My Sex Report: Intensities portray gender?
The film challenges traditional gender roles by highlighting a woman's psychological and sensory development. Her journey from a structured work life to sexual self-discovery highlights her significant role in driving the story.
How racially and ethnically diverse is My Sex Report: Intensities?
Given that it is a 1976 Japanese production, the cast is culturally homogeneous. It serves as a localized study rather than a representation of a diverse, multi-ethnic population.
How does My Sex Report: Intensities represent religion and culture?
The story emphasizes personal freedom and secular exploration over religious constraints. It critiques rigid social structures by examining individual desires and the breakdown of societal propriety.
Does My Sex Report: Intensities include disability representation?
There is no evidence of characters portraying physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film's narrative.
Present on Screen
- Highlights a woman's psychological and sensory development, challenging traditional gender roles.
- Emphasizes personal liberation and secular desire over rigid social or religious constraints.
Limited or Absent
- Lacks multi-layered breadth, particularly in terms of LGBTQ+ identities and non-cisgender representation.
- Maintains a culturally homogeneous cast with little racial or ethnic diversity.
Official Synopsis
A man accustomed to calling the shots in his girlfriend’s work life becomes intrigued by a nurse and begins drawing her into a sexual world she never imagined.
Where to Watch
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select or search, Escape to close.
Similar Movies
Street of Shame
1956
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 8.0 out of 10
The Bite
1966
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 6.9 out of 10
Belle de Jour
1967
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 6.3 out of 10
Third Base
1978
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.8 out of 10
Story of a Nymphomaniac
1975
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.7 out of 10
Skin of Roses
1978
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.9 out of 10
Debauchery
1983
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.2 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.