You are here:

The Oath

The Oath

Representation Score

9.0/10

Excellent

2010

Director

Laura Poitras

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Laura Poitras presents a sophisticated examination of state power that goes beyond conventional propaganda. By centering non-Western figures, the film effectively challenges the 'Western-as-protagonist' model common in documentaries about global security. The film's strength lies in its critical analysis of Western institutional power and its ability to highlight the ability to act of individuals caught in the machinery of the War on Terror. It prioritizes investigative journalism over patriotic sentiment, offering a nuanced perspective on institutional failures. However, the documentary's focus is strictly geopolitical, leaving limited space for representation of LGBTQ+ identities or disability. While it excels in cultural and racial perspectives, these specific social dimensions remain largely unexplored.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Oath have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The documentary does not focus on LGBTQ+ identities or stories. It does not include characters with non-traditional gender identities or sexual orientations, concentrating instead on geopolitical themes.

How does The Oath portray gender?

Good

The film challenges the typical male-dominated intelligence narrative by focusing on female journalists and investigators. These women are portrayed as key drivers of truth-seeking with significant professional authority and independence.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Oath?

Good

The narrative shifts away from Western-centric viewpoints by highlighting the lives of Abu Jandal and Salim Ahmed Hamdan. This gives significant influence to non-Western figures within the context of global security.

How does The Oath represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film critically examines Western institutions, portraying the CIA and Bush administration through a lens of moral ambiguity. It questions official state narratives by suggesting potential corruption in state actions.

Does The Oath include disability representation?

Fair

The film does not significantly address visible or invisible disabilities. Its focus remains on political and intelligence-based issues, rather than neurodiversity or physical disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • Highlights non-Western perspectives to challenge Western-centric global security narratives.
  • Challenges traditional intelligence clichés by emphasizing female journalists as authoritative truth-seekers.
  • Offers a sophisticated critique of Western institutional power and moral ambiguity.

Limited or Absent

  • Does not specifically address LGBTQ+ identities or non-traditional gender narratives.
  • Does not focus on neurodiversity or physical disabilities within the narrative.

Official Synopsis

Tells the story of two men, Abu Jandal and Salim Ahmed Hamdan, whose fateful encounter in 1996 set them on a course of events that led them to Afghanistan, Osama bin Laden, 9/11, Guantanamo, and the U.S. Supreme Court.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.