You are here:
See No Evil, Hear No Evil

See No Evil, Hear No Evil

1989

R

Director

Arthur Hiller

Runtime

102 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A murder takes place in the shop of David Lyons, a deaf man who fails to hear the gunshot being fired. Outside, blind man Wally Karue hears the shot, but cannot see the perpetrator. Both are arrested, but escape to form an unlikely partnership. Being chased by both the law AND the original killers, can the pair work together to outwit them all?

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.5/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or any exploration of non-heteronormative identities. The story focuses exclusively on the sensory-impaired protagonists and their immediate circumstances.

Gender Representation

Limited

The narrative is heavily male-centric, concentrating almost all agency within the central duo. Female characters are relegated to peripheral, supporting roles without subverting traditional gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The pairing of Richard Pryor and Chazz Palminteri provides meaningful racial representation. Their cross-racial alliance uses shared disability as a bridge between their different ethnic backgrounds.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film operates within a standard Western crime-comedy framework. It does not offer a systemic critique of religion, capitalism, or broader societal institutions.

Disability Representation

Excellent

This is the film's standout element, centering on deaf and blind protagonists. They possess high agency, using their unique perspectives to navigate a world built for the able-bodied.

Strengths

  • The film provides high levels of agency to characters with significant sensory disabilities.
  • The central casting creates a meaningful cross-racial alliance between African American and Italian American leads.
  • Disability is treated as a lived reality rather than a mere plot device or object of mockery.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative relies on a traditional, male-centric structure with minimal female agency.
  • There is a complete absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-heteronormative identities.
  • The film follows conventional Western crime-comedy tropes without offering systemic cultural critiques.

AI Analysis

The film is a specialized character study that succeeds by centering its narrative on unconventional protagonists. By placing characters with significant sensory disabilities at the heart of the action, it moves away from standard able-bodied hero archetypes and grants them genuine agency. While the film excels in disability representation and offers a nuanced look at intersectional identity through its diverse lead pairing, it remains limited by traditional structures. The lack of gender diversity and LGBTQ+ presence keeps the film anchored in a conventional, male-dominated framework. Ultimately, the work is a progressive step for disability representation, even as it adheres to standard Western crime-comedy tropes and traditional gender dynamics.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.