
The Sticky Fingers of Time
1997

1999
Director
Cédric Klapisch
Runtime
109 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Arthur is invited to a New Year's Eve party to celebrate the year 2000. His girlfriend Lucie would like a baby from him but he refuses. Through the ceiling of the toilets, he discovers a passage leading to this futurist Paris. There, he meets an old man Ako who affirms he is his son and that he wants to exist. Otherwise he will vanish into the air. Arthur is still hesitant because his life is an unfulfilled one: a has a little lucrative job, is uncertain about his future and things are getting out of hand when Ako discovers the passage and interferes in the party.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The story centers on heteronormative romantic histories and traditional partnerships. It lacks explicit LGBTQ+ character arcs or non-cisnormative identities within its central plot.
Gender Representation
Women are depicted with significant intellectual and emotional depth, often driving the film's philosophical inquiries. The narrative highlights the breakdown of communication within traditional masculine frameworks.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The ensemble cast reflects the multicultural reality of Paris. It presents various ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds as an integrated part of a cosmopolitan urban ecosystem.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film prioritizes secular, urban existence over religious moralities. It explores postmodern themes of subjectivity and the fragmentation of truth through non-linear vignettes.
Disability Representation
There is no prominent focus on visible or invisible disabilities. Characters are defined by interpersonal relationships and psychological states rather than neurodivergence or physical disability.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Cédric Klapisch’s film succeeds in capturing a multifaceted, cosmopolitan portrait of Paris. By utilizing an ensemble cast and a vignette-based structure, the work avoids a monolithic perspective, instead embracing the social complexity and multiculturalism of the city. However, the film remains anchored in conventional romantic dynamics. While it challenges traditional narrative structures through postmodern themes, it lacks significant representation for LGBTQ+ identities and characters with disabilities. Ultimately, the film is a study of modern connection and urban interconnectedness. It excels at portraying a diverse social fabric but stays within certain traditional frameworks regarding gendered romantic roles.

1997

2011

2012

2021

1984

2020

2019

2009

2017

1999

2015

2024
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.