
Short Term 12
2013

2014
RDirector
George C. Wolfe
Runtime
104 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
When an accomplished pianist is diagnosed with the devastating and incurable disease ALS, she hires a directionless young woman who becomes her full-time caregiver. Complete opposites, the strangers form a life-changing bond inspiring each other to live life to fullest, while being brought together by the most challenging of circumstances.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The story focuses on the emotional intimacy between two women through caregiving. It does not explicitly center non-heteronormative identities or critique heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
The film centers female agency and intellect, disrupting traditional hierarchies. It portrays the caregiver role as a position of high-agency empowerment rather than domestic submission.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
A predominantly Black lead cast challenges Hollywood norms by placing Black women in high-status professional roles. This provides depth to characters often relegated to the periphery.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative critiques the isolation of high-status, capitalist lifestyles. It emphasizes human connection and communal support over rigid professional and social structures.
Disability Representation
The film explores neurodegenerative decline with significant agency. It focuses on the protagonist's struggle for autonomy rather than treating illness as a mere source of pity.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
George C. Wolfe delivers a sophisticated study of intersectionality by blending race, class, and disability. The film succeeds by disrupting expectations of who occupies the center of high-status dramas, placing Black women in roles defined by intellectual rigor. By centering the lived experience of ALS rather than an able-bodied perspective, the film avoids common tropes of pity. It uses the caregiver-patient relationship to explore complex power dynamics and human vulnerability. While the interpersonal framework remains relatively conventional and lacks explicit LGBTQ+ themes, the film's refusal to rely on racial or gendered stereotypes provides a nuanced portrait of the human condition.

2013

1990

2011

2014

2010

2018

2004

1992

2004

2017

2020

2014
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.