You are here:
The Awful Tooth

The Awful Tooth

1952

Approved

Director

Seymour Kneitel

Runtime

6 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A cat is being driven mad --- a short distance --- by an aching wisdom tooth and discovers in the Remedy Book a remedy that requires only the eating of a crow. The cat captures the first crow that comes along, but the crow is smarter than the cat, and offers other remedies, none of which call for crow-eating.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.4/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities. It follows a standard animal-fable structure common to the 1950s.

Gender Representation

Limited

The story focuses on a singular cat protagonist and a crow foil. There is no indication of nuanced gendered power dynamics or subverted hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

As an anthropomorphic animation, the film does not engage with human racial or ethnic identities. The conflict remains centered on biological and physical struggles.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The plot utilizes a traditional fable structure centered on a 'Remedy Book.' It lacks themes that challenge Western or established knowledge structures.

Disability Representation

Limited

A wisdom tooth ailment serves as a comedic plot device to drive slapstick madness. It does not offer a nuanced exploration of chronic pain.

Strengths

  • Utilizes a clear, engaging fable structure to drive the comedic narrative.
  • Features a focused, goal-oriented plot centered on a relatable physical conflict.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks representation of diverse human identities, including race, gender, and LGBTQ+ perspectives.
  • Uses physical ailment primarily as a slapstick device rather than exploring disability with nuance.
  • Fails to engage with complex social hierarchies or cultural intersectionality.

AI Analysis

The Awful Tooth is a mid-century animated short that prioritizes classical slapstick and traditional comedic structures. The narrative is driven by a singular, goal-oriented plot involving a cat's physical discomfort, which functions more as a genre trope than a meaningful character study. Because the film relies on anthropomorphic animal archetypes, it avoids human social complexities such as race, gender, or sexual orientation. The focus remains strictly on a localized, individualistic struggle for physical relief through a fable-like framework. Ultimately, the film adheres to the established studio standards of 1952. It lacks the intersectional depth or systemic critique necessary to address diverse social identities, functioning instead as a conventional piece of character-driven physical comedy.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.