New Showbiz

You are here:
The Queen's Green Planet

The Queen's Green Planet

2018

Director

Jane Treays

Runtime

47 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Featuring a unique conversation between The Queen and Sir David Attenborough as they walked in the garden at Buckingham Palace last summer, a landmark documentary will explore the ambition of a remarkable new initiative - a vast network of native forests across Britain and the Commonwealth, protected forever in The Queen's name.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.2/10

Good

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The documentary focuses on environmental stewardship and institutional conservation. It does not explicitly center LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative expressions, though it avoids derogatory tropes.

Gender Representation

Good

The film disrupts conventional hierarchies by emphasizing the scientific authority and communicative agency of its participants. The dialogue shifts focus from monarchical power to a collaborative model of leadership.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

By focusing on the Commonwealth, the film moves beyond an Anglo-centric perspective. It frames reforestation as a collective effort spanning diverse nations and global ecosystems.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative prioritizes ecological stability over industrial expansion. It promotes a form of secular environmentalism where the sacred is found in the preservation of the natural world.

Disability Representation

Fair

The film maintains a professional, observational tone that avoids mockery or 'inspiration porn.' However, it does not proactively center neurodivergent or physically disabled voices.

Strengths

  • The Commonwealth focus provides an intersectional, global perspective that moves beyond Anglo-centric views.
  • The narrative successfully shifts focus from monarchical power to collaborative environmental stewardship.
  • The film avoids harmful tropes and maintains a professional, observational tone throughout.

Areas for Improvement

  • The documentary does not proactively center neurodivergent or physically disabled voices in its discourse.
  • LGBTQ+ identities and non-cisnormative expressions are not explicitly represented or explored.
  • The narrative remains centered on prominent institutional figures rather than a broader range of diverse individual voices.

AI Analysis

The documentary functions as a sophisticated piece of environmental advocacy that disrupts traditional expectations of monarchical portraiture. It utilizes the prestige of its subjects to advocate for a globalized, ecologically-centered worldview. Rather than focusing on the preservation of Western power structures, the narrative shifts from nationalistic merit to a systemic, collective responsibility toward the planet. This approach effectively deconstructs the idea of nature as a mere resource for industrial consumption. While the film succeeds in its global scope and ecological messaging, it remains largely neutral regarding specific identity-based representation, focusing instead on institutional and scientific stewardship.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.