
Still Tickin': The Return of 'A Clockwork Orange'
2000

1993
Director
Paul Joyce
Runtime
94 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
This straight-talking program seeks to understand the enigmatic and controversial Sam Peckinpah, whose violent films such as The Wild Bunch and Straw Dogs had a telling effect on the cinema of the 1970s and 80s. Those who knew and worked with him, including actor James Coburn, actress Ali MacGraw, his associate Katherine Haber, his cousin Bob Peckinpah, and several screenwriters and producers, examine his life in an attempt to separate the man from the persona. Clips from key films reinforce this detailed discussion of Peckinpah's art and a fixation on violence that still permeates Hollywood today.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The documentary focuses on the professional and personal life of Sam Peckinpah through industry testimonies. It lacks explicit LGBTQ+ character arcs or narratives that critique heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
Female figures like Ali MacGraw and Katherine Haber provide critical insights as interviewees. However, the narrative remains centered on the male protagonist and masculine identity archetypes.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film reflects the historical context of Peckinpah’s era, focusing on the established Hollywood hierarchy. It does not prioritize non-Anglo-Saxon perspectives or diverse casting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film examines subjective morality and Peckinpah's fixation on violence. It analyzes his interaction with the Hollywood system rather than promoting broader institutional critiques.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible evidence regarding the portrayal of visible or invisible disabilities within this biographical study.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
This documentary functions as a biographical retrospective of Sam Peckinpah, prioritizing historical accuracy and industry testimony. The structure follows a traditional 1990s documentary format that centers on a singular male figure and his professional legacy. The film's scope is limited by its subject matter, which inherently reflects the Hollywood hierarchies of the 1960s and 70s. Consequently, the representation of diverse identities is secondary to the exploration of Peckinpah's persona and cinematic influence. While the film includes significant female voices, the narrative architecture remains anchored in masculine archetypes. It serves as a study of a specific filmmaker rather than a platform for intersectional social deconstruction.

2000

1991

1973

1998

2011

2016

2005

1994

2020

2021

2013

1988
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.