
Uuno Turhapuro muuttaa maalle
1986

2011
Director
Fredrik Boklund
Runtime
89 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In Knohult things havn't changed much. Eulalia is tired of Nisse who's engaged in all sorts of inventions in his workshop or poaching in the forest rather than to repair the water pump. When Eulalia in protest begins swimming in soft drinks and water the plants with spirit Åsa-Nisse sees nothing else to do but to repair the pump. As with all his inventions he adds a few extra features ... When he starts the machine the ground rumbles and up comes oil instead of water! Now, not only Åsa-Nisse, but the whole Knohult sees their chance to become wealthy! But "Dunderpumpen", as he calles the invention, turns out to be stronger than anyone had imagined, and when shady Scanian oil magnates with support of the Swedish government wants their share of the pie Knohult declares themselves a republic...
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. The narrative focus remains strictly on the central interpersonal dynamic between the protagonist and Eulalia.
Gender Representation
Eulalia serves as an active agent of protest rather than a passive domestic figure. While she exerts influence through unconventional methods, the plot is still primarily driven by the male protagonist's inventions.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting appears to be a homogeneous rural Swedish community. There is no mention of racial or ethnic blending or diverse casting within the narrative.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a strong critique of institutional power. By pitting a small community against predatory oil magnates and the government, it prioritizes local autonomy over centralized authority.
Disability Representation
There is no documented evidence of characters with physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities in this work.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The film presents a bifurcated profile, excelling in thematic subversion while lacking demographic breadth. It functions as a critique of systemic exploitation, framing state and corporate entities as antagonists to communal interests. However, the narrative lacks intersectional depth. The absence of LGBTQ+, racial, and disability representation prevents the film from achieving a higher aggregate score despite its progressive political themes.

1986

1975

2015

1994

1978

1988

2018

1992

1978

1956

2021

2001
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.