You are here:

Messengers 2: The Scarecrow

Messengers 2: The Scarecrow

Representation Score

2.8/10

Limited

2009

R

Director

Martin Barnewitz

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Messengers 2: The Scarecrow is a conventional horror film that relies heavily on established genre clichés. It prioritizes a man-versus-supernatural conflict, leaving little room for exploring diverse identities or deconstructing social norms. The narrative reinforces traditional views of family and economic struggle. By focusing on a localized, homogeneous rural setting, the film avoids engaging with diverse identities or systemic social critiques. Ultimately, the film operates within narrow boundaries, prioritizing suspense and rural dread over any meaningful representation of underrepresented groups.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Messengers 2: The Scarecrow have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or storylines. It focuses on a traditional nuclear family structure without addressing non-straight relationships.

How does Messengers 2: The Scarecrow portray gender?

Limited

Female characters such as Mary are primarily defined by their domestic roles and relationships to the male protagonist. The film adheres to typical genre conventions rather than challenging gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Messengers 2: The Scarecrow?

Limited

The setting seems homogeneous, focusing on a localized agrarian struggle. There is no indication of diverse ethnic backgrounds being integrated into the rural environment.

How does Messengers 2: The Scarecrow represent religion and culture?

Limited

The story uses the struggling farmer cliché to explore economic hardship. It focuses on personal misfortune rather than critiquing broader societal issues.

Does Messengers 2: The Scarecrow include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The supernatural terror does not incorporate neurodivergence or physical disability as part of the narrative.

Present on Screen

  • The film effectively uses established rural horror clichés to build suspense.
  • The narrative provides a clear, focused conflict centered on familial and economic survival.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks diversity in racial, ethnic, and LGBTQ+ representation.
  • Character roles are largely defined by traditional gender archetypes and domestic stressors.
  • There is no meaningful inclusion of characters with disabilities or neurodivergence.

Official Synopsis

The family man farmer John Rollins is stressed with his financial situation: the crows and the lack of irrigation are destroying his crop of corn; the bank is near closure of his mortgage; he does not have credit to fix the water pump or to buy seeds; and his marriage is in crisis and his wife Mary is giving too much attention to her friend Tommy. When John accidentally discovers a hidden compartment in the barn, he finds a creepy scarecrow but his son Michael makes him promise to destroy it. However, his neighbor Jude Weatherby visits him, gives a six-pack of beer to the abstemious John and convinces him to put the scarecrow in the cornfield. Out of the blue, the life of John changes: the crows die; the pump works again irrigating the land; and the banker responsible for the closure has an accident and dies. However, he feels that his land is possessed by something evil that is threatening his beloved family.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.