You are here:

Objectified

Name: Objectified
Director: Gary Hustwit
Released: 2009
Duration: 75 min

Representation Score

9.1/10

Excellent

2009

Not Rated

Director

Gary Hustwit

Runtime

75 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Objectified succeeds as an intellectual deconstruction of how industrial design functions as a site of power. It moves beyond aesthetics to question the systemic biases embedded in manufactured objects. The film's greatest strength is its ability to challenge the myth of the 'universal' user. By exposing how standardized design can marginalize specific populations, it provides a sophisticated look at human-centered utility. While the documentary offers a globalized professional landscape, it remains somewhat detached from specific identity politics. It focuses more on systemic failures than on the lived experiences of underrepresented individuals.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Objectified have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not explicitly depict queer identities or challenge assumptions that everyone is straight. It maintains a neutral stance regarding LGBTQ+ narratives within its thematic focus.

How does Objectified portray gender?

Excellent

The documentary highlights how universal design standards often default to male needs, reinforcing patriarchal norms and marginalizing women's ergonomic experiences.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Objectified?

Good

A globalized perspective is presented through designers and architects from various international contexts. The film avoids an Anglo-centric view by showcasing how diverse cultural perspectives influence production.

How does Objectified represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film engages with critiques of Western capitalist structures and planned obsolescence. It explores how design serves as a tool of social control within established economic systems.

Does Objectified include disability representation?

Good

The narrative touches on how non-inclusive design creates barriers for different physicalities. However, it does not center neurodivergent or disabled voices as primary agents of the story.

Present on Screen

Critiques design standards that default to male needs and reinforce patriarchal norms.
Provides a globalized perspective that avoids an Anglo-centric view of design history.
Challenges Western capitalist structures and the social implications of planned obsolescence.

Limited or Absent

Lacks explicit representation or focus on LGBTQ+ identities and non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth narratives.
Does not center the lived experiences of neurodivergent or disabled individuals as primary voices.
Avoids deep engagement with specific racial identity politics in favor of broader global perspectives.

Official Synopsis

A feature-length documentary about our complex relationship with manufactured objects and, by extension, the people who design them.

How are these scores produced? →