You are here:
The Follower

The Follower

2016

Director

Damián Romay

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Tragedy strikes when Chelsea's flight back home crashes in the wilderness. The only other urvivor of the crash, Evelyn King, who just so happens to be a huge fan of Chelsea, pulls her to safety. As Evelyn cares for Chelsea's wounds, she becomes increasingly obsessive. Chelsea begins to realize that her caretaker may have more sinister plans in store and she must find a way to overcome her injuries in order to escape from Evelyn, whose insane adoration may ultimately be Chelsea's demise.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.4/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film explores an intense, obsessive bond between two women. While the relationship lacks explicit queer identity markers, the subtext of insane adoration suggests a departure from heteronormative dynamics.

Gender Representation

Good

The story disrupts traditional hierarchies by centering the conflict on female agency. It subverts the damsel in distress trope by replacing a male savior with a female antagonist.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

There is no specific information regarding the racial or ethnic identities of the characters. Consequently, the narrative's approach to racial diversity remains unexamined.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The wilderness setting deconstructs traditional Western social structures like family or law. This isolation places the characters in a state of moral relativism driven by survival.

Disability Representation

Fair

Physical injury serves as the primary driver of tension and a central obstacle to the protagonist's agency. It remains unclear if this portrayal offers depth beyond a plot device.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional gender hierarchies by centering female agency and psychological complexity.
  • Replaces the standard male savior trope with a complex, female-driven power dynamic.
  • Uses an isolated setting to explore moral relativism outside of traditional social structures.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit markers for LGBTQ+ or racial identities, limiting intersectional depth.
  • Physical disability and injury appear to function primarily as plot devices for tension.
  • The narrative provides insufficient information regarding the characters' ethnic or cultural backgrounds.

AI Analysis

The film succeeds in subverting gendered survival tropes by centering the psychological conflict entirely on two women. By weaponizing the caretaker archetype against the protagonist, it avoids traditional male-led narrative structures. However, the work lacks explicit identity markers. The absence of clear racial, ethnic, or LGBTQ+ identifiers prevents a more nuanced exploration of intersectional identity, leaving much of the characterization to subtext. Ultimately, the film functions as a character study of obsession. It trades external environmental threats for internal psychological ones, though it relies heavily on physical vulnerability as a narrative engine.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.