You are here:

I.D.

I.D.

Representation Score

4.3/10

Fair

1995

Director

Phil Davis

Runtime

107 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

I.D. is a focused look at the British carceral system, emphasizing a hyper-masculine environment. It lacks representation of LGBTQ+ individuals and women, focusing instead on physical strength and aggression. The film offers a sharp critique of the legal and penal systems, showing them as oppressive and corrupt. It highlights the struggle of individuals against a dehumanizing system. While the film excels in its cultural commentary on institutional failure, it falls short in providing diverse representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does I.D. have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film adheres to a strict focus on masculinity, with no room for LGBTQ+ identities. The prison setting emphasizes traditional masculine roles, excluding any representation of queer experiences.

How does I.D. portray gender?

Limited

Women play a negligible role in the narrative due to the all-male environment. Power dynamics are centered around physical strength and aggression, with no significant female influence.

How racially and ethnically diverse is I.D.?

Limited

The cast primarily consists of white actors, reflecting the socio-economic context of the British prison system. There is limited diversity in the main character arcs.

How does I.D. represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film effectively critiques Western institutions, depicting legal and penal systems as corrupt and dehumanizing. Survival is portrayed as a response to systemic failures.

Does I.D. include disability representation?

Minimal

The film does not address visible or invisible disabilities. Characters are defined by their physical abilities and violent actions, rather than any form of disability.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a powerful critique of systemic corruption within Western legal and penal institutions.
  • Effectively deconstructs the power dynamics of the carceral state and institutional authority.
  • Presents a compelling narrative of moral relativism where survival shapes ethical decisions.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks demographic diversity, particularly in women's ability to drive the story and queer representation.
  • Shows limited racial and ethnic diversity in the main character arcs.
  • Does not explore neurodivergence or physical disabilities meaningfully.

Official Synopsis

Four policemen go undercover and infiltrate a gang of football hooligans hoping to route out their leaders. For one of the four, the line between 'job' and 'yob' becomes more unclear as time passes . . .

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.