You are here:

Enfant Terrible

Name: Enfant Terrible
Director: Oskar Roehler
Released: 2020
Duration: 134 min

Representation Score

7.4/10

Good

2020

Unrated

Director

Oskar Roehler

Runtime

134 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Enfant Terrible is a film that prioritizes psychological fragmentation over conventional morality, effectively deconstructing social pillars like the family and capitalist structures. However, its historical and geographic specificity limits its scope, resulting in a predominantly white, European cast. While the film avoids clichés in its portrayal of gender and queer identity, it sometimes uses psychological instability as a stylistic device rather than a focused exploration of disability.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Enfant Terrible have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film focuses on a character deeply connected to the history of queer cinema. It delves into the complex identities and unconventional relationships within the 1960s radical theater movement.

How does Enfant Terrible portray gender?

Good

The film breaks down traditional masculine leadership by emphasizing emotional instability and vulnerability. Instead of stable patriarchal figures, it highlights the breakdown of traditional domestic roles and unconventional power dynamics.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Enfant Terrible?

Limited

The casting reflects the predominantly white, European demographics of 1960s Munich. The film adheres to the historical context, resulting in a homogeneous cast.

How does Enfant Terrible represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film provides a sophisticated critique of Western institutions and the nuclear family. It shifts away from singular Christian morality towards moral relativism and critiques the nihilism of capitalist high society.

Does Enfant Terrible include disability representation?

Fair

Mental health and neurodivergence are explored through the protagonist's self-destructive psychological states. These elements highlight an existential struggle rather than serving as a platform for disability advocacy.

Present on Screen

Sophisticated deconstruction of the nuclear family and traditional Western social pillars.
Nuanced portrayal of queer identity and unconventional relationships.
Effective subversion of traditional masculine hierarchies and patriarchal leadership.

Limited or Absent

Lack of racial and ethnic diversity due to historical setting constraints.
Potential use of psychological instability as a stylistic device rather than advocacy.
Limited representation of diverse cultural backgrounds within the period setting.

Official Synopsis

When 22-year-old Rainer Werner Fassbinder storms the stage of a small, progressive theatre in Munich 1967, and seizes the production without further ado, nobody suspects this brazen young rebel to become one of the most important post-war German filmmakers. Despite early setbacks, many of his films breakout at the most renowned films festivals and polarise audience, critics and filmmakers alike. His radical views and self-exploitation, as well as his longing for love, have made him one of the most fascinating film directors of this time.

How are these scores produced? →