The film lacks explicit documentation of non-heteronormative romantic arcs. However, Plympton’s surrealist style often deconstructs social norms, potentially offering a fluid approach to identity.

Character dynamics remain unconfirmed, but the director's history of grotesque, absurdist designs tends to disrupt traditional gender hierarchies. The work avoids idealized depictions of masculinity or femininity.

As an independent animation, the film likely departs from homogeneous studio casting standards. Stylized or anthropomorphic characters may serve as metaphors for exploring diverse identities.

The narrative prioritizes subjective morality and surrealist logic over institutional frameworks. It often critiques systemic rigidity by viewing traditional Western hierarchies through a lens of absurdity.

Physical and neurodivergent traits are often presented as fundamental to the character's essence through distorted animation. It is unclear if these portrayals grant characters true agency.