You are here:

Side Effects

Side Effects

Representation Score

5.0/10

Fair

2005

R

Director

Kathleen Slattery-Moschkau

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Side Effects primarily functions as a critique of corporate capitalism rather than a study of diverse identities. The film's narrative strength lies in its challenge to the stability of Western corporate ethics. While it lacks significant representation of LGBTQ+ or racial diversity, it effectively questions the morality of corporate systems. The film's narrative focus on the protagonist's professional journey and moral dilemmas allows it to challenge traditional corporate norms, but it does not delve deeply into issues of multi-layered identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Side Effects have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not include any explicit mentions of LGBTQ+ characters or non-straight relationships. The story focuses solely on the protagonist's professional journey and moral dilemmas.

How does Side Effects portray gender?

Good

Karly Hert is a powerful female character with significant professional influence and economic standing. Her role challenges the traditional male-dominated corporate hierarchy.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Side Effects?

Limited

The film centers on a specific professional environment without showing a diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast. There is no explicit focus on racial or ethnic diversity.

How does Side Effects represent religion and culture?

Good

The story strongly critiques Western institutions and capitalist structures, presenting the pharmaceutical industry as morally compromised. The protagonist's moral awakening highlights ethical issues within the industry.

Does Side Effects include disability representation?

Minimal

The plot involves the pharmaceutical industry but does not depict any characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • The film features a powerful female protagonist with significant professional influence and economic standing.
  • The narrative provides a sharp critique of Western corporate structures and the ethics of the pharmaceutical industry.
  • The director's industry background adds authenticity to the deconstruction of corporate norms.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ characters or non-straight relationships.
  • There is no evidence of racial or ethnic diversity within the professional milieu.
  • The story does not address the lived experiences of individuals with disabilities.

Official Synopsis

America! Built on a better pill. Karly Hert has spent the last ten years selling drugs. Legally, that is. Karly is a pharmaceutical sales representative. She sells pills to doctors. She makes lots of money. She has a company car. She has a nice fat expense account. But there's a growing pit in Karly's stomach. Something isn't right behind the scenes at big pharma. Based on the director's decade working directly for the industry.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.