You are here:

We Are, Our Mountains

Name: We Are, Our Mountains
Director: Henrik Malyan
Released: 1969
Duration: 94 min

Representation Score

4.5/10

Fair

1969

Director

Henrik Malyan

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Henrik Malyan’s film is a culturally specific drama that excels in regional ethnic representation. By centering Armenian identity, it offers a meaningful departure from Moscow-centric or Western-centric cinematic norms. However, the film adheres to the traditional social hierarchies of its era. The focus remains heavily on male-driven conflict and communal survival, leaving little room for gender diversity or queer narratives. Ultimately, the work's strength lies in its critique of institutional authority. It pits local, organic morality against the rigid structures of the state, providing a sophisticated look at communal ethics.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does We Are, Our Mountains have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. Given its 1969 Soviet production context, the story focuses on traditional communal structures rather than non-straight relationships.

How does We Are, Our Mountains portray gender?

Fair

The story centers around male shepherds, placing the primary conflict and ability to act within a male-dominated social structure. There is little evidence of women in positions of authority or challenging gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is We Are, Our Mountains?

Good

The film highlights an Armenian mountain community, disrupting Western-centric storytelling by presenting a non-Slavic, non-Western cultural landscape as the central focus.

How does We Are, Our Mountains represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The story critiques centralized state legalism by comparing local morality against formal police inquiries. It emphasizes communal survival and organic ethics over rigid, institutionalized laws and property rights.

Does We Are, Our Mountains include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of visible or invisible disabilities being used as central character arcs. The film focuses on the general physical hardships of mountain life instead.

Present on Screen

Strong regional ethnic representation through its Armenian setting.
Effective critique of centralized authority and state-driven legalism.
Meaningful depiction of non-Western cultural landscapes and ability to act.

Limited or Absent

Lack of gender diversity and women's ability to drive the story in the narrative.
Absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-straight themes.
Minimal focus on disability as a central character element.

Official Synopsis

The tranquility of a remote Armenian mountain community is disrupted when a group of shepherds affected by the pangs of an evening hunger, decide to butcher and barbecue the sheep of another's that have strayed into their herd. An official inquiry by the city police complicates matters, and questions of law, morality and community only seem to lead to further entanglements.

How are these scores produced? →