You are here:
What's to Do?

What's to Do?

1933

Passed

Director

Charles Lamont

Runtime

18 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Sonny Rogers has just gotten elected class president, he's a star baseball player, and has a cute girlfriend. But, thanks to the conniving of his rival, Harry Vanderpool, he and his whole family are going to have to move to Seattle! Sonny needs the help of his pals and his pesky little sister, Mary Lou, to get out of this one.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.1/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film focuses on a conventional romantic pairing between the protagonist and his girlfriend. There is no indication of non-cisnormative identities or any critique of heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Limited

The story centers on a male protagonist's leadership and athletic success. Female characters, like the sister Mary Lou, appear to serve as secondary plot devices to support male agency.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The narrative lacks any mention of a diverse cast or the subversion of casting norms. It appears to reflect the homogeneous social structures typical of 1930s Hollywood.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

Themes revolve around traditional institutions like the nuclear family and school hierarchies. The plot emphasizes social stability and personal rivalry rather than cultural or systemic critique.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The narrative focuses entirely on adolescent social dynamics and familial disruption.

Strengths

  • The film provides a clear look at the traditional social hierarchies and domestic values of the 1930s.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks diverse casting and fails to include intersectional identities or systemic critiques.
  • Female characters are relegated to supporting roles that serve the male protagonist's journey.

AI Analysis

What's to Do? is a period-typical comedy that reinforces the social and gender hierarchies of the early 1930s. The narrative follows a standard hero's journey centered on a male protagonist's struggle to maintain his social standing and residence. The film lacks intersectional agency or any attempt to subvert contemporary social norms. Instead, it relies on conventional storytelling tropes, focusing on domestic and scholastic frameworks that prioritize traditional values of familial cohesion and social stability. Ultimately, the work functions as a standard studio-era comedy. It provides a window into the homogeneous casting and narrative structures prevalent in early sound-era filmmaking.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.