What a Woman!
1956
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.0 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
It's a Woman's War
1971
Director
Ettore Maria Fizzarotti
Runtime
100 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A girl is drafted due to a misunderstanding and this gives her the occasion to check on her boy-friend, whom she believes to be a womanizer.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.2/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film centers on heteronormative romantic dynamics. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative gender identities or narratives that critique traditional relationship structures.
Gender Representation
A female protagonist gains agency by assuming a male role through a military draft. While she navigates a male-dominated space, her motivations remain rooted in traditional romantic interests.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast and setting reflect a homogeneous Mediterranean social strata typical of 1971 Italy. There is no evidence of intentional ethnic diversification within the narrative.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story focuses on interpersonal conflicts within traditional social structures. It does not engage in a critique of Western institutions, capitalism, or organized religion.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible focus on characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities in this production.
Strengths
- The central conceit provides a female protagonist with unique agency within a male-dominated military setting.
- The narrative offers a window into how women navigate gendered social expectations through a gender-swap trope.
Areas for Improvement
- The film lacks racial and ethnic diversity, adhering to a homogeneous Mediterranean social strata.
- The narrative fails to critique systemic power dynamics or institutional structures like religion and capitalism.
- The focus on traditional romantic interests limits the potential for deeper systemic subversion.
AI Analysis
The film operates as a traditional genre comedy that utilizes a gender-swap trope to grant its protagonist temporary agency. While it explores the navigation of gendered expectations, it lacks intersectional complexity. The narrative remains tethered to the conventional social and romantic hierarchies of the early 1970s. It functions more as a character-driven comedy than a deconstruction of systemic power dynamics. Ultimately, the film lacks the racial diversity and systemic critique necessary for a higher progressive rating, reflecting the demographic norms of its era.
Similar Movies
The Woman Driver
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
Woman in Love
2011
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
Oh, That Woman of Mine!
1967
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
The Soldier with Great Maneuvers
1978
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
The Lieutenant Wore Skirts
1956
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.0 out of 10
The Prophet
1968
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.0 out of 10
Οι Φανταρίνες
1979
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
Long Live the Seal
1982
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Mr. Wing Commander
1963
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Girls at Arms
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.7 out of 10
Firehouse
1987
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.