You are here:
The Best of Times

The Best of Times

1986

PG-13

Director

Roger Spottiswoode

Runtime

104 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A small-town loser determines to have one more shot at the big time by winning a football game.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.4/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities. Social and romantic dynamics remain centered on traditional pairings, maintaining a strictly heteronormative structure.

Gender Representation

Good

Annette Bening’s character provides a strong counterpoint to 1930s tropes by acting as a professional journalist. Her intellectual agency challenges the era's typical expectations of female passivity.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The narrative focuses on socioeconomic divides within a largely homogeneous urban setting. It lacks significant racial or ethnic breadth in its central character arcs.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film offers a sharp critique of capitalist structures and the failures of Western economic institutions. It portrays the struggle of the working class against an oppressive system.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible representation of physical, neurodivergent, or mental health disabilities within the plot or character arcs.

Strengths

  • Subverts 1930s gender tropes by giving female characters professional agency and intellectual presence.
  • Provides a sophisticated critique of capitalist structures and the systemic failures of the Great Depression.
  • Explores nuanced power dynamics between gender and class within professional environments.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks any meaningful representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative social dynamics.
  • Fails to include racial or ethnic diversity within the central character arcs.
  • Provides no representation of physical, neurodivergent, or mental health disabilities.

AI Analysis

The film operates primarily as a class-based critique of the Great Depression rather than an intersectional study. It succeeds in subverting period-typical gender roles through its professional female lead, but fails to include diverse racial or LGBTQ+ perspectives. While the narrative provides a sophisticated look at systemic institutional failure and the ethics of survival, the lack of representation across several key identity markers keeps the overall score low. It is a period piece that prioritizes economic friction over social diversity.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.