Revenge of the Cheerleaders
1976
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.5 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Cheerleaders
1973
RDirector
Paul Glickler
Runtime
83 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A group of cheerleaders from the local high school decide to show their school spirit for their football team by sleeping with the opponents the night before the game so that they can be so worn out the opposition won't be able to play.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.3/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film operates within a strictly heteronormative framework. Sexuality is used as a comedic plot device rather than a means for exploring queer identities or romantic arcs.
Gender Representation
Female characters drive the plot through strategic, subversive actions. They act as the primary architects of a scheme, challenging the trope of the passive, decorative cheerleader.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film likely follows the homogeneous casting conventions of 1973. There is no evidence of meaningful racial integration or non-Anglo-Saxon majority representation.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative offers a lighthearted critique of social structures by framing anti-social sabotage as a comedic victory. It prioritizes situational ethics over traditional institutional morality.
Disability Representation
There is no information available regarding the inclusion or portrayal of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
Strengths
- Female characters are portrayed as active, strategic agents rather than passive figures.
- The narrative subverts traditional gender hierarchies through unconventional female-led plotlines.
Areas for Improvement
- The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative gender expressions.
- There is a notable absence of racial and ethnic diversity in the casting.
- The narrative fails to address disability or neurodivergent representation.
AI Analysis
The film is a genre-specific comedy that relies on transgressive behavior to move its plot forward. While it avoids many traditional social commentaries, it succeeds in subverting gendered expectations by granting its female protagonists significant agency and tactical control. However, the work remains limited by the demographic and social norms of the early 1970s. It lacks intersectional depth, focusing on a narrow, heteronormative view of sexuality and social disruption. Ultimately, the film's subversion is localized to gender roles rather than broader systemic or identity-based dimensions.
Similar Movies
Under the Sheets
1976
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.2 out of 10
#1 Cheerleader Camp
2010
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
The Amorous Sisters
1980
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
The Teasers
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Beautiful Wrestler: Down for the Count
1984
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
Squeeze Play
1979
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.2 out of 10
Nymphs Anonymous
1968
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.0 out of 10
Bedside Head
1972
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.3 out of 10
Delta Delta Die!
2003
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
P.R.O.F.S.
1985
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
La collegiale
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.0 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.