
Small Faces
1996

1993
Director
Erik Van Looy
Runtime
98 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Sammy Raes, a nice, naive law-freshman from a simple family, dies in a form of hazing known as the 'flying carpet'. The father of the arrogant fraternity president Guy Bogaerts who ordered this reckless procedure abuses his connections to prevent a judicial homicide conviction, while the college authorities prefer to avoid a scandal in the press. However Sammy's freshmen friends Tom Smits and Denn
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any visible LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The story focuses entirely on a collegiate tragedy and its legal fallout without addressing non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
The narrative is heavily centered on a male-dominated fraternity and academic hierarchy. It explores masculine dysfunction through reckless hazing rather than subverting traditional gender roles.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film reflects a relatively homogeneous Belgian social landscape typical of its era. There is no evidence of significant racial blending or diverse casting within the setting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story offers a sharp critique of Western institutions and class-based power. It highlights the corruption within the judicial system and the elite's abuse of authority.
Disability Representation
There is no information available regarding the depiction of physical, neurodivergent, or mental health disabilities in this work.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Ad Fundum serves as a gritty social critique of institutional corruption rather than a study in intersectional representation. The film's primary value lies in its deconstruction of systemic justice, exposing how legal and academic pillars prioritize reputation over accountability. However, this critique is delivered through a very narrow demographic lens. The narrative is dominated by male students and authority figures, lacking the breadth of racial, gender, or LGBTQ+ perspectives necessary for a more inclusive viewing experience. Ultimately, the film focuses on the friction between individual agency and systemic failure. While it successfully challenges the infallibility of the elite, it does so within a largely homogeneous social framework.

1996

1988

1988

2010

1997

2016

2021

1999

1953

2000

1977

2010
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.