Smalltime
1996

1996
RDirector
Gillies MacKinnon
Runtime
108 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Three teenage brothers, gang-member Bobby, troubled mama's boy Alan and self-assured prankster Lex, reside in a downtrodden section of Glasgow, Scotland, circa 1968. But while Bobby and Alan are beginning to experience the power of raging hormones, the story focuses on Lex, who begins a downward spiral after he accidentally shoots the leader of Bobby's gang. Lex's cockiness and immaturity unfortunately prevent him from understanding the effect his subsequent crimes will have on both himself, and on those around him.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film centers on heteronormative masculine camaraderie. There is a notable absence of non-cisnormative gender identities or same-sex intimacy within the central character arcs.
Gender Representation
The narrative focuses almost exclusively on the male experience within the Mod subculture. Women function primarily as supporting figures, such as girlfriends or groupies, rather than driving the plot.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast is highly homogeneous, reflecting the specific working-class white demographic of 1960s Glasgow. The story does not incorporate characters of color into the central power dynamics.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques the music industry as an exploitative entity. It explores subcultural rebellion and the tragic inevitability of the protagonists' descent into addiction and anti-social behavior.
Disability Representation
There is no significant depiction of visible or invisible disabilities or neurodivergence. The focus remains on the physical and psychological toll of substance abuse as a plot driver.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Small Faces is a period-specific study of working-class masculinity and subcultural identity in 1960s Glasgow. While it effectively deconstructs the myth of musical stardom and critiques the exploitative nature of the industry, the narrative remains traditional in its demographic composition. The film prioritizes the internal volatility of male-dominated social structures over intersectional depth. This results in a narrow focus that lacks diverse representation across gender, race, and identity categories. Ultimately, the work functions as a biographical tragedy that adheres to the social constraints of its era, offering limited visibility for marginalized groups.
1996

1997

2010

1982

2021

1998

2007

2010

2004

1999

2009

2007
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.