
At Eye Level
2016

2011
Director
Andi Rogenhagen
Runtime
86 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Eva lives a happy life with her father, an unsuccessful but always optimistic car salesman, her consumerist mother, and her quirky grandmother. But Eva is a tad different - she suffers from Tourette's syndrome. Her family has long been accustomed to her tics and the accompanying insults and bullying, and Eva has come to grips with her role as an outsider. When her father gets a job offer to work in Berlin, they must suddenly leave their familiar surroundings. But Eva won't have it, this move must be prevented - at any price!
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit mention of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities. While the protagonist is an outsider, this identity is framed through neurodivergence rather than a queer lens.
Gender Representation
The story centers on a family unit featuring a consumerist mother and a quirky grandmother. It presents standard domestic archetypes without evidence of subverting traditional gender hierarchies.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative focuses on a localized family moving within a German context. There is no indication of a multi-ethnic cast or the inclusion of diverse racial identities.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film explores the friction between individual identity and social norms. The family structure appears to follow a traditional Western domestic model without explicit anti-institutional sentiment.
Disability Representation
Tourette’s syndrome is the central narrative driver. Eva is an active protagonist with significant agency, rather than a passive character defined solely by her condition.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Alive and Ticking is a focused character study that succeeds by placing neurodivergence at the heart of its storytelling. By centering Eva’s perspective, the film grants a character with Tourette’s syndrome genuine agency and influence over the plot. However, the film’s scope is narrow. The narrative architecture relies on traditional Western family archetypes and lacks intersectional depth. There is little to no representation of racial, LGBTQ+, or diverse cultural identities. Ultimately, while the film provides a strong and respectful portrayal of disability, it remains a homogeneous domestic drama that lacks broader social inclusivity.

2016

1995

2013

2025

2007

2009
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.