You are here:

Bad Influence

Bad Influence

Representation Score

6.1/10

Good

2017

Director

Claudia Huaiquimilla

Runtime

96 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Bad Influence is a significant work that prioritizes the perspectives of underrepresented ethnic groups. It succeeds by deconstructing traditional notions of authority and morality through a nuanced lens of socioeconomic influence. The film's primary strength is its authentic racial and ethnic representation, which provides a sophisticated critique of institutional power. However, the film lacks explicit narratives regarding LGBTQ+ identities or disability. While it challenges certain gender hierarchies, it occasionally relies on traditional depictions of female vulnerability.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Bad Influence have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not focus on LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisgender expressions. It explores the bonds between underrepresented youth but lacks overt queer narratives or direct challenges to the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does Bad Influence portray gender?

Fair

The narrative disrupts traditional hierarchies by highlighting the vulnerability of young characters. However, the depiction of female characters sometimes leans into traditional portrayals of precarious femininity.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Bad Influence?

Excellent

The film excels by featuring a predominantly Indigenous and Mestizo cast. This centering of underrepresented voices serves as a post-colonial critique of mainstream, Anglo-centric cinematic norms.

How does Bad Influence represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The story critiques Western and capitalist structures by framing delinquency as a result of systemic failure. It portrays traditional institutions like family and state as ineffective or absent.

Does Bad Influence include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of visible or invisible disabilities that serve as central narrative drivers.

Present on Screen

  • Authentic centering of Indigenous and Mestizo voices and lived experiences.
  • Sophisticated critique of systemic oppression and institutional failure.
  • Effective deconstruction of traditional male authority and social hierarchies.

Limited or Absent

  • Lack of explicit LGBTQ+ representation or queer-centered narratives.
  • Absence of characters or storylines addressing disability.
  • Occasional reliance on traditional depictions of female vulnerability.

Official Synopsis

A rebellious young man nicknamed Tano and a shy Mapuche boy named Cheo bond together by facing the violence and prejudice they carry during their complicated adolescence.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.