You are here:

Death of a Bureaucrat

Name: Death of a Bureaucrat
Director: Tomás Gutiérrez Alea
Released: 1966
Duration: 84 min

Representation Score

3.7/10

Limited

1966

Unrated

Director

Tomás Gutiérrez Alea

Runtime

84 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Tomás Gutiérrez Alea delivers a sophisticated critique of institutional power, prioritizing systemic deconstruction over demographic breadth. The film succeeds by challenging the sanctity of the state apparatus, framing governance as a source of individual alienation. While the work lacks representation for LGBTQ+ and disability communities, it offers high progressive value through its anti-institutional lens. It effectively disrupts conventional expectations of authority by portraying the 'system' as an absurd, dehumanizing machine. Ultimately, the film functions as a piece of national cinema that emphasizes localized identity and the struggle of the individual against administrative inertia.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Death of a Bureaucrat have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film focuses on the professional struggles of a male protagonist and does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or critiques of the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does Death of a Bureaucrat portray gender?

Fair

The narrative centers on the male experience of disillusionment. Female characters are present but do not drive the plot.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Death of a Bureaucrat?

Good

The cast is predominantly Cuban, reflecting Havana's post-revolutionary demographics. It prioritizes a localized, non-Anglo-Saxon identity.

How does Death of a Bureaucrat represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film excels in critiquing dehumanizing administrative structures. It portrays bureaucracy as an oppressive force that supersedes traditional morality.

Does Death of a Bureaucrat include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no discernible focus on physical, sensory, or neurodivergent representation within the film's thematic core.

Present on Screen

Strong cultural critique of dehumanizing institutional and administrative structures.
Authentic portrayal of post-revolutionary Cuban demographic realities.
Effective use of a postmodern lens to challenge systemic authority.

Limited or Absent

Lack of representation for LGBTQ+ identities and non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth characters.
Minimal focus on physical, sensory, or neurodivergent representation.
Traditional gender roles that do not actively subvert social hierarchies.

Official Synopsis

A young man attempts to fight the system in an entertaining account of bureaucracy amok and the tyranny of red tape. Restored by the Academy Film Archive and the Instituto Cubano del Arte e Industrias Cinematográficos in 2019.

How are these scores produced? →