You are here:

Good People

Name: Good People
Director: Henrik Ruben Genz
Released: 2014
Duration: 90 min

Representation Score

1.2/10

Minimal

2014

Director

Henrik Ruben Genz

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Good People is a conventional crime thriller that prioritizes plot-driven tension over social representation. The narrative structure relies on traditional clichés, focusing on a homogeneous and racially uniform central unit. The film lacks the intentionality required to challenge established social hierarchies. It functions primarily as a cautionary tale of moral decay within a narrow social lens. Ultimately, the work provides very little perspective on diverse identities, remaining rooted in a standard, non-diverse framework.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Good People have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film centers on a heterosexual relationship. There is no presence of LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex intimacy.

How does Good People portray gender?

Limited

The story follows a man and a woman in a traditional partnership. While the woman participates in decision-making, the film does not challenge traditional gender roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Good People?

Limited

The narrative focuses on a white, middle-class couple. The central character arcs lack significant racial or ethnic diversity.

How does Good People represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film explores moral relativism and the pressures of capitalism. However, it frames these issues through individual greed rather than systemic critique.

Does Good People include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no visible or invisible disabilities portrayed. The film does not engage with disability as a thematic element.

Present on Screen

Explores themes of situational ethics and moral relativism.
Provides a nuanced look at how economic instability affects personal morality.

Limited or Absent

Lacks racial and ethnic diversity within the primary cast.
Fails to include LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisgender identities.
Does not engage with disability as a character-driven element.
Relies on traditional gender roles without challenging them.

Official Synopsis

Tom and Anna Wright, a young American couple, fall into severe debt while renovating Tom's family home in London. As the couple faces the loss of their dream to have a house and start a family, they discover that the tenant in the apartment below them is dead, and he's left behind a stash of cash—$400,000 worth. Though initially hesitant, Tom and Anna decide that the plan is simple: all they have to do is quietly take the money and use only what's necessary to get them out of debt. But when they start spending the money and can't seem to stop, they find themselves the target of a deadly adversary—the thief who stole it—and that's when very bad things start happening to good people.

How are these scores produced? →