
Money Plane
2020

2014
RRuntime
90 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Tom and Anna Wright, a young American couple, fall into severe debt while renovating Anna's family home in London. As the couple faces the loss of their dream to have a house and start a family, they discover that the tenant in the apartment below them is dead, and he's left behind a stash of cash—$400,000 worth. Though initially hesitant, Tom and Anna decide that the plan is simple: all they have to do is quietly take the money and use only what's necessary to get them out of debt. But when they start spending the money and can't seem to stop, they find themselves the target of a deadly adversary—the thief who stole it—and that's when very bad things start happening to good people.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film centers on a heteronormative romantic partnership. There is no presence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.
Gender Representation
The story follows a man and a woman in a traditional partnership. While Anna participates in decision-making, the film does not subvert gender hierarchies.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative focuses on a white, middle-class couple. The central character arcs lack significant racial or ethnic diversity.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film explores moral relativism and the pressures of capitalism. However, it frames these through individual greed rather than systemic critique.
Disability Representation
There are no visible or invisible disabilities portrayed. The film does not engage with disability as a thematic element.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Good People is a conventional crime thriller that prioritizes plot-driven tension over social representation. The narrative architecture relies on traditional tropes, focusing on a homogeneous and racially uniform central unit. The film lacks the intentionality required to challenge established social hierarchies. It functions primarily as a cautionary tale of moral decay within a narrow social lens. Ultimately, the work provides very little intersectional perspective, remaining rooted in a standard, non-diverse framework.

2020

2012

2008

2015

2018

2001

2001

2011

2001

2014

2011

2014
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.