You are here:
Money

Money

2016

R

Director

Martín Rosete

Runtime

86 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Two wealthy businessmen are about to get away with $5 million in ill-gotten money until their plans are revealed by an uninvited house guest.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.8/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The story centers on heteronormative domesticity and traditional romantic pairings. There is no evidence of queer identities or non-cisnormative narratives within the film.

Gender Representation

Fair

Sylvia Dudek displays intellectual autonomy through her professional ambitions. However, her agency often remains reactive to the criminal machinations of the male characters.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The cast includes racial variety, notably through Jesse Williams. Despite this, the core conflict leans toward a relatively homogeneous depiction of the wealthy upper class.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film critiques Western capitalist structures by framing the pursuit of wealth as inherently corrupt. The plot exposes the moral instability of the elite.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible focus on visible or invisible disabilities. No characters are defined by physical impairment or neurodivergence in the primary plot.

Strengths

  • Provides a critique of Western capitalist structures and the corruption of the wealthy elite.
  • Offers a female character with professional ambitions and intellectual autonomy.
  • Includes racial variety within the ensemble cast.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative narratives.
  • Relies on conventional heteronormative domestic structures and character archetypes.
  • Fails to incorporate characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

AI Analysis

Money functions as a genre-driven thriller that deconstructs the sanctity of the wealthy domestic sphere. It avoids reinforcing heroic capitalism by portraying its protagonists as corrupt individuals involved in industrial espionage. While the film introduces some racial variety and provides a female character with professional ambitions, it remains largely tethered to conventional archetypes. The narrative lacks deep intersectional complexity or intentional demographic subversion. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its critique of class and wealth rather than its commitment to diverse representation.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.