You are here:
Under Our Skin 2: Emergence

Under Our Skin 2: Emergence

2014

TV-PG

Director

Andy Abrahams Wilson

Runtime

64 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

This sequel revisits the unforgettable characters from the acclaimed documentary UNDER OUR SKIN, and investigates new research and scandals in the exploding global Lyme disease crisis.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.0/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film focuses on a medical crisis rather than identity-specific narratives. While it includes diverse patient perspectives, it lacks explicit LGBTQ+ storylines or critiques of heteronormative medical practices.

Gender Representation

Fair

The documentary centers the agency of patients, many of whom are women. This approach disrupts traditional hierarchies by elevating female voices navigating a medical system that often dismisses them.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The film investigates a global crisis, suggesting an international scope. However, specific details regarding the racial composition of the interviewees or cast remain unconfirmed.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative critiques traditional Western institutions by investigating medical scandals and research failures. It prioritizes the lived experiences of victims over the perceived stability of the medical establishment.

Disability Representation

Excellent

This is the film's strongest area, centering individuals with chronic, invisible illnesses. It grants patients high agency, focusing on systemic complexities rather than sentimental depictions.

Strengths

  • Empowers individuals with invisible disabilities to challenge medical hegemony.
  • Disrupts traditional hierarchies by centering the agency of female patients.
  • Critiques systemic institutional failures and Western medical authority.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit LGBTQ+ centric storylines or identity-specific narratives.
  • Provides limited specific detail regarding racial and ethnic diversity.
  • Does not explicitly address specific racial or identity-based medical critiques.

AI Analysis

The documentary excels at shifting power dynamics by centering the lived experiences of those with invisible disabilities. By positioning patients as active investigators of systemic failure, it avoids common tropes of medical victimhood. While the film lacks explicit focus on LGBTQ+ or specific racial narratives, its global scope and critique of Western institutional authority provide a progressive framework. It effectively challenges the hegemony of medical institutions. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its investigative lens, which empowers marginalized individuals to challenge large-scale medical and corporate infrastructures.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.