
Losing Isaiah
1995

2004
Director
Amma Asante
Runtime
91 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
At 17 Leigh-Anne Williams has a six month old baby to look after, with only the help of three teenage squatters who flog stolen gear to make ends meet. A neighbour (actually from Turkey) across the street becomes target to her growing paranoia that Social Services are going to take her daughter, Rebecca, away from her. Her behaviour becoming increasingly desperate as her delusions over her neighbour grow.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The story focuses entirely on the protagonist's psychological and socioeconomic struggles.
Gender Representation
Leigh-Anne is a central figure whose agency is tested by systemic pressures. The film avoids traditional male-led hierarchies, focusing instead on the complexities of female-led survival.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative centers Black lived experiences within an urban setting. A Turkish neighbor adds ethnic complexity to the neighborhood's social fabric.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques Western institutions by portraying state intervention as a source of oppression. Survival mechanisms are framed as responses to systemic economic exclusion.
Disability Representation
While no character has a diagnosed disability, the protagonist displays significant psychological distress and paranoia. These mental health challenges drive the plot's tension.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Amma Asante delivers a poignant study of intersectional struggle, centering a Black female protagonist whose autonomy is constantly contested by state institutions. The film avoids moralizing the characters' survival tactics, instead framing their actions as a logical byproduct of systemic neglect. The narrative architecture effectively disrupts conventional expectations of social stability. By prioritizing the subaltern experience and critiquing the intrusive nature of Western social structures, the film achieves a high level of progressive complexity. While the film excels in racial and cultural representation, it lacks LGBTQ+ visibility and does not explicitly center characters with diagnosed disabilities.

1995

2004

1994

2001

2008

2017

2016

2017

2016

2010

2010

2019
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.