
Occupy Unmasked
2012
No Poster Available
2016
PGDirector
Chuck Untersee
Runtime
106 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Looming world government, a world "elite", The United Nations...loss of American sovereignty! The light of our "shining city on the hill" dims. Dissecting America under judgment, Lieutenant General William Boykin and Alex Jones join Charlie Daniels in a primer for the uninitiated on The New World Order with Biblical perspective. The global feudal police state unfolds...We were born for such a time as this!
Overall Score
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on geopolitical sovereignty and biblical prophecy. There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing queer experiences.
Gender Representation
The narrative emphasizes traditional hierarchies through military leadership and patriarchal biblical interpretations. It relies on masculine archetypes of protection and leadership.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The thematic core centers on American exceptionalism and Western, Anglo-centric ideals. There is no evidence of a diverse cast or non-white majority.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques globalism and promotes Christian morality. It positions religious tradition and patriotism as safeguards against a perceived global police state.
Disability Representation
The documentary focuses on political and theological discourse. There is no mention of subjects with visible or invisible disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The documentary operates within a strictly traditionalist framework, prioritizing biblical prophecy and national sovereignty over intersectional storytelling. Its narrative architecture is designed to reinforce conventional Western hierarchies and religious morality rather than disrupt them. By centering on figures like Lieutenant General William Boykin and Alex Jones, the film leans into classical masculine and patriotic archetypes. This approach deliberately rejects progressive values in favor of a singular, conservative worldview. Ultimately, the film serves as a critique of secularism and globalism, positioning Western religious and national identities as the primary defense against modern institutional shifts.

2012

2020

2010

2012

2016

2010

2012

2009

2010

2016

2014

2014
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.