You are here:

Ex-Shaman

Ex-Shaman

Representation Score

4.5/10

Fair

2018

Director

Luiz Bolognesi

Runtime

81 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Ex-Shaman is a profound piece of post-colonial cinema that refuses to adopt a Western perspective. Its primary strength lies in its rigorous deconstruction of the dominant narrative, centering indigenous ability to act to challenge historical erasure and the destructive nature of industrial expansion. By positioning the Paiter Suruí as the protagonists of their own struggle against capitalism and organized religion, the film disrupts voyeuristic cinematic habits. It moves beyond mere inclusion to provide a sophisticated critique of the systemic forces threatening indigenous sanctity. However, the film's scope is narrow regarding specific identity markers. It does not engage with LGBTQ+ themes or disability-centric narratives, focusing instead on the broader communal and spiritual crisis of a people facing ethnocide.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Ex-Shaman have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film focuses on the spiritual and communal survival of the Paiter Suruí. There are no documented LGBTQ+ characters or non-traditional gender identities within this ethnographic scope.

How does Ex-Shaman portray gender?

Fair

The narrative centers on shamanic traditions that emphasize male leadership and elderhood. It avoids Western dominance by framing leadership through cultural vulnerability.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Ex-Shaman?

Excellent

The film achieves exceptional representation by centering an entirely indigenous cast. It reclaims the gaze by making the Paiter Suruí the primary agents of their own story.

How does Ex-Shaman represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The story critiques extractive capitalism and the corrosive influence of Western institutions. It prioritizes indigenous animism over Christian morality, depicting modernization as a source of spiritual fragmentation.

Does Ex-Shaman include disability representation?

Minimal

While the film addresses physical vulnerabilities caused by modernization, no characters have a disability as a central identity marker. No specific disability representation is present.

Present on Screen

  • Exceptional centering of indigenous ability to act and community-led storytelling.
  • Sophisticated critique of extractive capitalism and Western institutional encroachment.
  • Effective reclamation of the cinematic gaze away from Western voyeurism.

Limited or Absent

  • Lack of representation for LGBTQ+ identities or non-traditional gender roles.
  • Limited focus on specific disability identities or character arcs.
  • Narrative structure adheres to traditional patriarchal shamanic hierarchies.

Official Synopsis

Ever since their first contact with the Western world in 1969 the Paiter Suruí, an indigenous people living in the Amazon basin, have been exposed to sweeping social changes. Smartphones, gas, electricity, medicines, weapons and social media have now replaced their traditional way of life. Illness is a risk for a community increasingly unable to isolate itself from the modernization brought by white people or the power of the church. Ethnocide threatens to destroy their soul. With dogged persistence, Perpera, a former shaman, is searching for a way to restore the old vitality to his village.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.