You are here:
Check It

Check It

2016

Not Rated

Director

Dana Flor, Toby Oppenheimer

Runtime

91 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Fed up with being pushed around, a group of gay and trans teens of color form a gang and fight back on the brutal streets of Washington D.C. They call their gang ‘Check it’ and this group of one-time victims of bullying, rape and abuse have turned the tables on anyone trying to hurt them. The group formed to provide its members safety in numbers and let people know that if they jump a queer kid in D.C., they may get beaten into a coma. This raw and intimate portrait follows three childhood friends as they struggle to survive and claw their way out of gang life through an unlikely avenue: fashion.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

8.9/10

Excellent


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Excellent

The film centers entirely on gay and transgender youth. It explores queer identity within high-risk environments, depicting the community through collective defense and solidarity rather than mere vulnerability.

Gender Representation

Excellent

Significant platform is given to non-cisnormative gender identities. The narrative disrupts traditional hierarchies by showing trans individuals navigating hyper-masculine gang environments and defining themselves through fashion.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The cast consists of teens of color, making the intersection of race and sexuality central. It highlights how racialized identities navigate urban power dynamics in Washington D.C.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film portrays gang formation as a survivalist response to systemic failure. It critiques the efficacy of traditional institutions by framing these behaviors as necessary protection against oppression.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no explicit evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in the film.

Strengths

  • Exceptional intersectional storytelling that centers the lived experiences of marginalized youth.
  • Provides profound agency to subjects, portraying them as active agents rather than victims.
  • Challenges heteronormative assumptions by depicting queer solidarity and collective defense.
  • Offers a sophisticated critique of systemic failures through a unique cultural lens.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks explicit representation or discussion regarding physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

Check It is a powerful example of intersectional storytelling that avoids the trap of portraying marginalized subjects as mere victims. Instead, it presents queer youth of color as active agents who restructure their social reality through collective action and creative expression. The documentary effectively challenges societal hierarchies by validating the survival strategies used by those failed by state and social structures. By moving from defensive survival to the transformative pursuit of fashion, the film offers a sophisticated look at identity and agency. Ultimately, the work provides a nuanced critique of systemic pressures, using the specific subculture of Washington D.C. to explore how identity and survival intersect in high-stakes environments.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.