The Sprinkler Sprinkled
1895
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.1 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Arroseur et arrosé, III
1897
Director
Francis Doublier
Runtime
1 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A gardener is watering his flowers, when a mischievous boy sneaks up behind his back, and puts a foot on the water hose. The gardener is surprised and looks into the nozzle to find out why the water has stopped coming. The boy then lifts his foot from the hose, whereby the water squirts up in the gardener's face. The gardener chases the boy, grips his ear and slaps him in his buttocks. The boy then runs away and the gardener continues his watering. Three separate versions of this film exist, this is the third version.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
1.3/10
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any LGBTQ+ characters or narratives regarding non-heteronormative identities. The plot centers entirely on a physical interaction between a male gardener and a boy.
Gender Representation
Representation is limited to traditional male archetypes of the late 19th century. There is no female agency or subversion of gender hierarchies present in this short comedy.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast appears homogeneous, reflecting the standard demographic of early European short films. No multi-ethnic representation is evident in the narrative.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The setting is a localized garden focused on simple physical comedy. It operates within traditional norms rather than engaging with diverse cultural deconstructions.
Disability Representation
No characters are depicted with visible or invisible disabilities. The actors function within standard physical capacities typical of slapstick comedy.
Strengths
- Provides a clear look at the foundational slapstick traditions of the late 19th century.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks any representation of female characters or diverse gender identities.
- Features a homogeneous cast with no racial or ethnic diversity.
- Provides no engagement with LGBTQ+ themes or disability representation.
AI Analysis
This 1897 short is a foundational piece of slapstick that prioritizes physical humor over character depth. Because it focuses on a brief, reactionary interaction between a man and a child, it lacks the narrative space for complex social representation. The film reflects the era's technical and social constraints, presenting a homogeneous and traditional worldview. It functions as a simple situational comedy rather than a vehicle for intersectional or diverse storytelling.
Similar Movies
Idiots Deluxe
1945
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
A Plumbing We Will Go
1940
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.0 out of 10
His New Job
1915
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.3 out of 10
The Miller and the Sweep
1897
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.6 out of 10
The Big Swallow
1901
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.1 out of 10
Over the Fence
1917
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.1 out of 10
How Bridget's Lover Escaped
1907
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.3 out of 10
Flat Foot Stooges
1938
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.7 out of 10
Pick a Peck of Plumbers
1944
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.1 out of 10
Playing the Ponies
1937
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
Pass the Gravy
1928
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.1 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.