You are here:

Brush of Baphomet

Name: Brush of Baphomet
Director: Kenneth Anger
Released: 2009
Duration: 5 min

Representation Score

6.2/10

Good

2009

Director

Kenneth Anger

Runtime

5 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Kenneth Anger’s documentary on Aleister Crowley’s artwork functions as a profound disruption of mainstream cultural and religious narratives. By centering on esoteric symbolism, the film inherently challenges traditional Western hierarchies and assumptions that everyone is straight or cisgender. The film excels in its cultural critique, offering a high degree of intellectual diversity by prioritizing secularism and subjective morality. It frames established religious systems as structures to be transcended rather than obeyed. However, the work remains limited by its narrow focus on Western esoteric traditions. This concentration results in lower scores for racial and ethnic diversity, as the subject matter is historically specific.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Brush of Baphomet have LGBTQ+ representation?

Good

The film engages with queer aesthetics through its focus on Aleister Crowley. It prioritizes symbolic identities that exist outside of straight-centered assumptions.

How does Brush of Baphomet portray gender?

Good

The narrative explores the subversion of gender hierarchies. It utilizes occult symbolism to blur masculine and feminine archetypes and challenge conventional social roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Brush of Baphomet?

Fair

The visual palette centers on Western esoteric traditions. While it lacks a diverse cast, it offers intellectual diversity through its focus on non-traditional belief systems.

How does Brush of Baphomet represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The work critiques Christian morality and religious hegemony. It centers on anti-establishment spirituality and the deconstruction of traditional Western institutional values.