
Art of Submission
2012

2005
RDirector
David J. Burke
Runtime
93 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
His name: infamous. His reputation: ruthless. But when James "Animal"Allen is locked up in a maximum security prison, he meets a revolutionary who changes his life. Now a reformed man, James is released only to find that his own son has assumed a life of crime and violence. Can a father haunted by his past redeem his family from the very streets he created, or will he be forced to make the ultimate sacrifice?
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. The narrative focuses on traditional masculine archetypes of fatherhood and crime.
Gender Representation
The story centers on a masculine arc involving a ruthless protagonist and his son. It prioritizes patriarchal lineage and traditional tropes of honor and sacrifice.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Thematic elements involving 'the streets' and incarceration suggest potential urban-centric narratives. However, there is no explicit confirmation of a non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The plot explores reform and the struggle against systemic criminality. It emphasizes traditional views of familial responsibility rather than deconstructing social institutions.
Disability Representation
There is no mention of neurodivergence, physical disabilities, or mental health conditions. The protagonist's reputation lacks specific evidence of psychological or physical disability agency.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Animal functions as a standard character-driven drama centered on the cycle of violence and paternal redemption. The narrative follows a conventional trajectory of an infamous man seeking atonement, relying heavily on established genre tropes. The film's structure prioritizes traditional masculine archetypes and patriarchal lineage. This focus limits the scope of the narrative, as it avoids disrupting social or cultural hierarchies in favor of a familiar redemption arc. While the setting suggests potential for urban-centric social commentary, the lack of specific character depth or diverse identity markers keeps the overall diversity score low.

2012

1996

2011

1999

2016

2018

2012

2015

2003

1996

2018

1979
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.