New Showbiz

You are here:
The Miracle of Love

The Miracle of Love

1968

X

Director

Franz Josef Gottlieb

Runtime

83 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The Film begins with an emphatically serious discussion between Kolle, the sex researcher Professor Hans Giese, and the psychologist Wolfgang Hochheimer. After that follow the first play scenes. In a buoyant conversation, two model cases of sexual difficulties in marriage and their causes are discussed. A newlywed couple one the one side and a couple already married for seven years on the other side discuss about their problems. The words are illustrated by play scenes, short comments which point to the consequences of a lack of sexual education are inserted in between. With the newlyweds, the premature orgasm of the husband causes his wife woes as she is missing the loving foreplay and aftermath. The second husband, an architect who has become father of two children in the meantime, in contrast, neglects his wife in favour of his job.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.3/10

Limited

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film focuses exclusively on heteronormative marital dynamics. There is no evidence of queer narratives or non-cisnormative identities within the story.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative explores gendered power dynamics by highlighting female dissatisfaction. It challenges the trope of the perfect husband by depicting male incompetence and neglect.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The production appears culturally homogeneous, focusing on Western European social issues. There is no indication of a diverse or multi-ethnic cast.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film adopts a secular approach by using psychology and sex research to discuss intimacy. However, it remains centered on the traditional institution of marriage.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The film provides no evidence regarding the inclusion of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Strengths

  • Challenges patriarchal tropes by depicting husbands as emotionally or physically inadequate.
  • Replaces religious moralism with a secular, scientific framework for discussing sexuality.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative narratives.
  • Displays a lack of racial and ethnic diversity within the cast and setting.
  • Fails to address disability representation or neurodivergent perspectives.

AI Analysis

The film serves as a period-specific study of sexual education and marital friction. It moves away from religious moralism by employing a scientific lens to examine intimacy and dysfunction. While the film offers some progressive elements by deconstructing the stability of the nuclear family, its scope is quite narrow. It primarily addresses the shortcomings of male providers and the emotional needs of wives. Ultimately, the work remains limited by its heteronormative focus and lack of racial or queer diversity, reflecting the cultural homogeneity of its 1968 context.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.