You are here:

Stubborn

Stubborn

Representation Score

3.9/10

Limited

1988

Director

Kartal Tibet

Runtime

84 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Stubborn (1988) functions primarily as a social comedy centered on the friction between rural communities and predatory corporate interests. The plot follows the fallout of a dam project expropriation and the subsequent sale of confidential information by corrupt actors. While the film offers a meaningful critique of industrial development and systemic greed, it lacks depth in representing diverse identities or underrepresented groups. The narrative is driven by socioeconomic conflict rather than the representation of diverse identities. Ultimately, the film's impact is found in its social commentary on corruption, though it remains limited by the traditional demographic frameworks common to its era.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Stubborn have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or individuals with non-traditional gender identities. It operates within a traditional comedic framework without addressing assumptions about straight relationships.

How does Stubborn portray gender?

Fair

The narrative focuses on corporate and commission-based conflicts, suggesting a traditional patriarchal structure. Women do not occupy roles that show significant influence or intelligence.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Stubborn?

Fair

Set in Turkish villages, the film likely reflects the ethnic homogeneity of the region. The story centers on domestic social issues rather than conflicts based on race.

How does Stubborn represent religion and culture?

Good

The film critiques capitalist structures and institutional corruption by showing how corporate greed exploits local villages. It focuses on localized systemic corruption rather than radical ideological changes.

Does Stubborn include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the narrative.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a sharp social critique of corporate greed and institutional corruption.
  • Highlights the systemic impact of industrial development on rural village life.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks multi-layered complexity and diverse character's ability to drive the story.
  • Shows minimal representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-traditional gender roles.
  • Does not feature characters with disabilities or diverse ethnic backgrounds.

Official Synopsis

While the dam project will be expropriated, Yellow poplar and Long poplar villages are included in the expropriation. Although this is supposed to protect the confidentiality, a member of the commission sells this information to a holding company and someone in that holding company sells what they heard to another holding company.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.